Wednesday 6 February 2013

The End Has Come

credits to Ryan Lee
APRIL INTAKE 2012 FOUNDATION IN DESIGN

Finally, the sem has end! I'm happy :DD: but sad as well. Happy that finally there is a break but sad that we have to be apart and no longer in the same class. But if there is no separation, then we wouldn't appreciate that much anymore. 


I truly learn a lot and maybe grow a little through this foundation :) These happy memories will stay in my heart forever. Wish everyone all the best in future and have a great time in anything you do! 

Oh yeah a quote that i think is really meaningful and it is the major thing that we should learn through this sem, 
"Nothing can stop an idea whose time has come," Victor Hugo. 
We must believe in ourselves :)


Hope to see you guys soon :')

In Regards, 
Shereene :] 

CS Final Project: Documentary


 link for the pic
This is our last group project for contextual studies. I am honored to join the group of G.L.Y.S. :) This is a good experience for us to meet and know more about the world outside. As usual we have research the way of documentary.

There are mainly 6 ways of doing documentary.

1. Poetic documentaries, which first appeared in the 1920’s, were a sort of reaction against both the content and the rapidly crystallizing grammar of the early fiction film. The poetic mode moved away from continuity editing and instead organized images of the material world by means of associations and patterns, both in terms of time and space. Well-rounded characters—’life-like people’—were absent; instead, people appeared in these films as entities, just like any other, that are found in the material world. The films were fragmentary, impressionistic, lyrical. Their disruption of the coherence of time and space—a coherence favored by the fiction films of the day—can also be seen as an element of the modernist counter-model of cinematic narrative.

2. Expository documentaries speak directly to the viewer , often in the form of an authoritative commentary employing voice over or titles, proposing a strong argument and point of view . These films are rhetorical, and try to persuade the viewer. (They may use a rich and sonorous male voice.) The (voice-of-God) commentary often sounds ‘objective’ and omniscient. Images are often not paramount; they exist to advance the argument. The rhetoric insistently presses upon us to read the images in a certain fashion. Historical documentaries in this mode deliver an unproblematic and ‘objective’ account and interpretation of past events.


3. Observational documentaries attempt to simply and spontaneously observe lived life with a minimum of intervention. Filmmakers who worked in this sub-genre often saw the poetic mode as too abstract and the expository mode as too didactic. The first observational docs date back to the 1960’s; the technological developments which made them possible include mobile lighweight cameras and portable sound recording equipment for synchronized sound. Often, this mode of film eschewed voice-over commentary, post-synchronized dialogue and music, or re-enactments. The films aimed for immediacy, intimacy, and revelation of individual human character in ordinary life situations.

4. Participatory documentaries believe that it is impossible for the act of film making to not influence or alter the events being filmed. What these films do is emulate the approach of the anthropologist: participant-observation. Not only is the filmmaker part of the film, we also get a sense of how situations in the film are affected or altered by her presenceThe filmmaker steps out from behind the cloak of voice-over commentary, steps away from poetic meditation, steps down from a fly-on-the-wall perch, and becomes a social actor (almost) like any other. (Almost like any other because the filmmaker retains the camera, and with it, a certain degree of potential power and control over events.)” The encounter between filmmaker and subject becomes a critical element of the film. 

5. Reflexive documentaries don’t see themselves as a transparent window on the world; instead they draw attention to their own constructiveness, and the fact that they are representations. How does the world get represented by documentary films? This question is central to this sub-genre of films. They prompt us to “question the authenticity of documentary in general.” It is the most self-conscious of all the modes, and is highly skeptical of ‘realism.’ It may use Brechtian alienation strategies to jar us, in order to ‘defamiliarize’ what we are seeing and how we are seeing it.

6. Performative documentaries  stress subjective experience and emotional response to the world. They are strongly personal, unconventional, perhaps poetic and/or experimental, and might include hypothetical enactments of events designed to make us experience what it might be like for us to possess a certain specific perspective on the world that is not our own, e.g. that of black, gay men in Marlon Riggs’s Tongues Untied (1989) or Jenny Livingston’s Paris Is Burning (1991). This sub-genre might also lend itself to certain groups (e.g. women, ethnic minorities, gays and lesbians, etc) to ‘speak about themselves.’ Often, a battery of techniques, many borrowed from fiction or avant-garde films, are used.

Reference for the text press HERE

After the long research we have done and watch many of the documentaries, which gave us a direction on how to deal with the style.

We are often scared of watching documentaries. Why? Once the word documentary come across our mind, our brain will automatically send us a message which is - boring, very boring and SUPER BORING......


 ENOUGH FOR DOCUMENTARIES . (Link for the pic)
In order to make it more interesting, we have used free style which is like a combination of observational documentary & performative documentary to film our own documentary. :) Something like traveling style of interviewing will be great. At first the scenery will catch the attention of audience and also it will give an enjoyment feeling. 

something like this :)

Then, we have started to search for our targets ( people who have their personal style in their work). Lucky enough for us, we have found  Mr. Chok Yen Hao an Mr. Yap Kim Boon.

PROFILE 1:

Name: Chok Yen Hao  
Age: 40
 Job: Domestic Tourist & Photographer
Aim / Dream: Introduce many beautiful places at Malaysia to all  Malaysians and also the foreigners.
Characteristics: Strong Curiosity, Loves to Travel especially (places he doesn't know the language), Helpful, Loves nature and his country;Malaysia. 








PROFILE 2: 

Name: Yap Kim Boon
Age: Unknown
Job: Artist
Aim: What I want to capture in each of my paintings is the expression of nature, in terms of both beauty and its importance to mankind as a whole. Nature is God 's gift to us, and if my art can somehow get that message across, so much the better.
Characteristics: Wise Man, Loves to paint, Loves nature, Discover new themes in unknown places, Dare to explore and take risk, Humble and always thankful.

Pictures of Mr. Chok's works: 

Beach of Kemasik, Terengganu
Paddy Fields of North Malaysia 


Scenery of  Old streets at Terrengganu
Waterfall 


Beautiful Clouds at North Malaysia
Malay Kampung


Tree
Paddy Field


Mountains
 Pictures while interviewing with Mr. Yap:
Numerous of PAINTSSS


Beautiful Gallery View 1
Beautiful Gallery View 2



Mr. Yap's Painting 1
Mr. Yap's Painting 2

















When we first met them, we were nervous yet excited. Things that we learn from them were never ending. As we were interviewing them, they talked about their life experienced and the job they were enjoying doing now. Both of them have something similar, which is they love nature very much. They are very kind to help us in many ways. Through this shooting we wanted to let the audience to know there are people are doing such meaningful jobs. Also the style of both of them are the same as well which is being free. They don't like to be restricted like what is the social world right now. And now, they have successfully break the chain of restriction. They can express freely how they feel through their work. Inspiration of their work are from everywhere. As long as you discover it with passion. 

Although their appearance are getting old, but their mind and soul are still young and full of spirit.
We know that success doesn't come easy unless you strive for it. 

HERE COMES THE TRAILER :)


AND NOW THE DOCUMENTARY OF TWO MEN, ONE DREAM!






Our Interview ends with a picture :) 





More info for Mr. Chok Yen Hao Click HERE to his Facebook Page. 









More info for Mr. Yap Kim Boon click HERE to his homepage. 




Final 2D Design Project: Texture Project

For this assignment we have to work in groups and design a 2D pattern and put on a 3D form.
Our group members are:
1. Eva Lim 2. Kate Soe 3. Yow Jia Xin 4. Ryan Lee and 5. Me.

This work is inspired by one of the artist that we have interviewed, which is         Mr. Yap Kim Boon. 

The way that he appreciates nature really inspired and touched us. One of his painting was a scenery painting of KL. This painting was inspired when he was in a restaurant that is surrounded with nature. He enjoyed the view of KL city very much but he was sad that nature has to be sacrificed.

At first, we have discussed on what theme and what tool to use. We have explored and experimented a lot of the elements. So we have decided on Contradiction of Human Life.


As we all know that at this new generation, the beautiful scenery and advanced architects is what we humans are proud of.











But the price of human made beauty is by destroying nature. We wanted this lamp to raise the awareness of humans to appreciate nature more and do not take it for granted.






For the 2D patterns we have used natural and recycled materials:
  • vegetables: bitter guard, stem of leaves
  • sticks
  • toothpicks
  • paint
  • fluffy strings
  • paper

We have used these materials to create many shapes. Then, we have came out with 4 designs and combined it to make it a lamp. Why lamp? Because the effect of lights are really eye catching while you present it.
Finally this is our product! 



I will talk about the first side of the design which is the illusion. It represents human thinks that everything is going to be fine. But we don't know that actually problem has occurred. It is the same when you look at the lamp far away, you will not notice that the grids are not in the same size. As you are near to it only you can see the differences.

Next is the buildings. There are day and night view of the city. It shows the beauty of the city view that are made by human. For the background of both city views, it was covered with the 2D elements that was painted with black paint. The elements were sun, clouds and haze. It represents the effects of the nature being destroyed. Only when day time you can see it clearly. When it is dark and the lights are on, you will enjoy the view. These are the contradictions.

How can we make a balance between nature and the rise of technologies? 
We should take the responsible before it's too late.    

Oh WAIT! Forgotten the essence of the design, which is the
  Gestalt Principle 
We have use most of the principles which involved: 
-similarity, continuation, figure and ground and alignment. 

For the illusion part we have used all the principles. These principles definitely can lead the viewers to have the illusion effect. 

For the city view we have used similarity on the buildings. Figure and ground we have applied on the windows. For the clouds, sun and sunlight we have used continuation. 


And that's the end about it. :) I hope you have enjoyed our production as we have put a lot of effort on it! Thanks (: